GED Section: Societal Anger and the Need for Unity

Source: boonchai wedmakawand / Getty

In today’s “Notes From The GED Section,”, D.L. Hughley shed light on the growing societal discontent and the fragmented perspectives that deepen division. He emphasized the selective nature of public outrage, explaining how people often only care when their own interests are threatened. “Everybody’s only angry about the things that affect them,” Hughley noted, identifying a key flaw in the pursuit of collective progress.

RELATED: ICYMI: D.L. Hughley Joined ‘The Don Lemon Show To Talk Kamala Harris, The Election And Diddy

Hughley attributed much of this discontent to economic instability and unpredictable policies. He pointed out that consumer confidence has sunk to a four-year low, largely because “so many things are erratic.” From job losses among veterans and farmers to layoffs of federal employees, worries about economic livelihood are driving this wave of frustration. Yet, Hughley observed, these concerns often lack empathy for others’ struggles. “Farmers didn’t know it would be them,” he said, referencing how initial support for government program cuts shifted to outrage once the consequences became personal.

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO THE DL HUGHLEY SHOW LIVE FROM 3-7PM ET

Another critical issue Hughley highlighted was the fragmentation of societal responses. He called out the hypocrisy in how outrage is selectively applied. For instance, he noted the disparity in attitudes toward threats. “You don’t want terrorists with tans, but you don’t mind terrorists when they’re people you can use,” Hughley said, condemning the inconsistent reactions to domestic extremism versus external threats.

Hughley made a compelling call for unity, stressing that addressing societal challenges requires people to care about issues beyond their own. “If you want to effect change, you have to be angry about things that have nothing to do with you,” he urged listeners. He also invoked the famous quote, “They came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak out because I was not a trade unionist,” to illustrate the dangers of selective empathy.

Ultimately, Hughley argued for collective accountability and action, warning that without unity, no one will be left to “speak for you” when your time of need arrives. His message was clear: only solidarity can pave the way for a just and stable society.

RELATED: GED Section: D.L. Salutes The Men Who Shaped His Manhood
RELATED: GED Section: Why “Toxic Empathy” And Christianity Don’t Mix